![]() Once this is done you could attempt to partition it again with gdisk or gparted. Assuming the card is on the host and is “/dev/sdb” (be very very careful to not get the wrong device), then you could zero this out (assuming hardware is not failed) via: sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=512 If you are unable to recover with testdisk, then you might consider wiping it out and re-partitioning in a last effort to at least have the SD card work. Mixing the two might cause some issues, but it really looks like the SD card failed. One side question though…was this SD card ever partitioned with fdisk? gdisk is for GPT partitioning and is what U-Boot works with (and is preferred), whereas fdisk has old style BIOS partitioning. Other than testdisk I can’t think of any way to non-destructively fix the content…and even if you destroy content with something like dd the hardware failure looks like something you won’t be able to get around. Interesting app, have never used testdisk before but just installed it. VFS: Dirty inode writeback failed for block device sdb1 (err=-5). Buffer I/O error on dev sdb1, logical block 3702784, lost async page write blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 29630464 sd 6:0:0:0: tag#0 Sense Key : Hardware Error Here are the ‘dmesg -follow’ output (pretty much repeating the same message) sd 6:0:0:0: tag#0 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE Looks like I have to give up, doesn’t it? Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name Total free space is 8158 sectors (4.0 MiB) Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boundaries You will need to delete this partition or resize it in another utility.ĭisk /dev/sdb: 61896704 sectors, 29.5 GiBĭisk identifier (GUID): C9E1BD58-1391-4ED3-AFC6-787226044014įirst usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 61896670 Warning! Secondary partition table overlaps the last partition by ‘sudo gdisk -l /dev/sdb’ GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 1.0.1 The ‘gdisk’ command, however gives some interesting report. ‘sudo fsck.ext4 /dev/sdb1’ (similar result as to ‘e2fsck’) e2fsck 1.42.13 (1)įsck.ext4: unable to set superblock flags on /dev/sdb1 Superblock needs_recovery flag is clear, but journal has data.Į2fsck: unable to set superblock flags on /dev/sdb1 ![]() ‘sudo e2fsck /dev/sdb1’ (took a few minutes to respond) e2fsck 1.42.13 (1) Here are the output for some commands on the host PC. It doesn’t come with SD reader, so I plug the SD into a USB3 card reader. I have a host PC pretty much doing nothing but to flash the DTB for TX2. ![]() it you should be able to use any Debian instructions you find.The SD card is in ext4 format. or HA some newer packages that may break OMV (which seems unlikely). As long as you don't have port conflicts between the OMV software and HA. none of them would effect what you're doing While there are a couple of very subtle differences. You end up in exactly the same spot as I'd you had just installed from the OMV iso. When you install Debian 10 and then install OMV. But I would be really surprised if you couldnt. You think I can properly install Home Assistant Core onto OMV5? But if I installed Debian, I could install both OMV and Home Assistant (this version Install Home Assistant Core). And from what I was told I understood that I cannot install the OMV ISO and expect to be able to install Home Assistant in parallel (not Docker). But I don't know linux and I asked around. ![]() Unsupported version of openmediavault Alles anzeigenĪfterwards I followed the steps presented here: and it got me to the same error: 01:46:34 (8.96 MB/s) - written to stdout ĭpkg-query: no packages found matching openmediavault
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |